Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than the LG V20's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is way newer and a bit lighter than LG V20's, although it is also a bit thicker. The Galaxy S10 features a bit better processor than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 has a slightly better looking display than LG V20, because it has a little higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a just a bit greater display density and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor.
LG V20 counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 features a bit longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy S10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.