Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than LG V20, getting an 86.3 score against 77. Although the Galaxy S10e is just a little bit thicker than the LG V20, it's lighter and also notably newer. LG V20 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a bit greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
LG V20 has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit more powerful CPU than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S10e features just a bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
LG V20 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S10e, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V20, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.