Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than LG V20, having a general score of 94.8 against 77. Even though Galaxy S20 is just a bit thicker than the LG V20, it's just a little bit lighter and also a lot newer. Galaxy S20 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S20 has a bit sharper display than LG V20, because it has a little bit greater screen pixels density, a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit larger display. Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S20 has superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.