Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than the LG V20, getting a score of 90.8 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE body is way newer, but a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the LG V20. LG V20 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S20 FE features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V20, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better processor than LG V20, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V20, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.