Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than LG V20, having a score of 98 against 77. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer cellphone than LG V20, but it is much heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better processor than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than LG V20, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a bigger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery life than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.