Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is better than the LG V20, with a score of 89.1 against 77. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE's construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little thicker than LG V20. The LG V20 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels amount in each inch of display.
LG V20 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S21 FE features a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy S21 FE's camera is just as good as the LG V20 one, and although the Galaxy S21 FE has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way worse 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V20, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.