Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than LG V20, getting a 93.4 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a just a little bit lighter phone than LG V20, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a brighter screen than LG V20, because although it has a quite lower display pixel density and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. LG V20 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.