Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than LG V20, with a overall score of 95.4 against 77. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is extremely newer than the LG V20, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper display than LG V20, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The LG V20 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger back camera sensor, a lot better video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.