Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | -- |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.14 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than LG V20, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 77. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is noticeably thinner and lighter than the LG V20. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a brighter screen than LG V20, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger display.
LG V20 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V20 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM.
Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better camera than LG V20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality. The Galaxy S25 features longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.