Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the LG V20, getting a score of 81 against 77. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a notably newer cellphone than the LG V20, but it's way thicker and a lot heavier. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 4 more cores.
The LG V20 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. LG V20 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V20 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery life than LG V20, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh. The LG V20 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back-facing camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V20, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.