Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than LG V20, having an 88.5 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a way newer and a little thinner phone than the LG V20, but it is also a little bit heavier. LG V20 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better camera than LG V20, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG V20 features a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.