Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than LG V20's 77 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the LG V20, although it's a little heavier. The LG V20 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a just a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cores. The LG V20 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG V20, because although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution and a lower video definition, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.