Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the LG V20's score of 77. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner phone than the LG V20, although it's a lot heavier. The LG V20 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a greater display pixels density.
The LG V20 has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a greater performance than LG V20, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 41% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a worse video quality and a lot worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG V20, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.