Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than LG V20, with a 90.6 score against 77. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is much newer and somewhat thinner than LG V20's, although it is also extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster CPU than LG V20, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The LG V20 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch. LG V20 features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations and a lot higher 16 MP resolution camera.
The LG V20 features a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 38% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.