Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-29 | -- |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than the LG V20's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a heavier but incredibly thinner device than the LG V20. The LG V20 counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a way lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1968 x 2184px. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a lot better resolution camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.