Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 115.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V20 is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a 77 score against 76.6. The LG V20 is an noticeably older device than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, but LG was able to build it just a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. LG V20 has a little bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit faster CPU than LG V20, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's camera is very similar to LG V20's camera, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in low light environments, a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, they both have the same video frame rate and the same 2560x1440 video quality.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG V20, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features greater battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.