Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a bit better than the LG V20, having a overall score of 78.1 against 77. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a much newer phone than the LG V20, although it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a bit better performance than LG V20, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
LG V20 counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density. The LG V20 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a very superior battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V20, because it has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.