Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-09-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than the LG V30, having a general score of 80 against 79.1. Google Pixel 3's design is newer and just a little lighter, but also a bit thicker than LG V30. The LG V30 and the Google Pixel 3 have similar processors, they have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG V30 has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a little higher pixels count per inch of display. LG V30 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V30 also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a larger aperture.
The LG V30 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V30 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.