Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a score of 79.1, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. Although the LG V30 is older and just a bit heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's construction is still a bit thinner. LG V30 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The LG V30 has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V30 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V30 also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and a much higher resolution back camera.
LG V30 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.