Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the LG V30's overall score of 79.1. Even though Google Pixel 4 is notably newer than the LG V30, it's a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better performance than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
LG V30 features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30 takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG V30 also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG V30 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30 counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a little more money than the LG V30, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.