Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the LG V30's global score of 79.1. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is way newer, but heavier and a bit thicker than the LG V30. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better display than LG V30, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little bigger display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V30 has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V30 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V30. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V30, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.