Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the LG V30, with a general score of 87.5 against 79.1. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot newer than the LG V30, it is a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G's processor is very similar to the CPU in LG V30, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V30 features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, a lower (4K) video quality and a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
The LG V30 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G has superior battery life than LG V30, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than LG V30, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.