Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a little bit better than the LG K52, with a 79.1 score against 76. LG V30's design is thinner and lighter than LG K52, although it was released 3 years before. LG V30 has a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
LG V30 has a bit superior processor than LG K52. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. LG V30 features a bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a much smaller back camera sensor providing a lot lower image quality and a back-facing camera with lot less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and video and a way higher video definition.
The LG K52 and LG V30 count with incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications, both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal storage. The LG K52 has better battery life than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.