Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than LG V30's general score of 79.1. Although the LG K92 is notably newer than the LG V30, it's incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V30 has a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30 features just a bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG K92 counts with a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor.
LG K92 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V30, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal storage. LG K92 has improved battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 21% more battery size.
LG K92 costs more than LG V30, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.