Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30 is a bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a 79.1 score against 76.7. LG V30's body is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG Stylo 6, although it was released many years before. LG V30 features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Stylo 6. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V30 has a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG Stylo 6 and LG V30 feature very similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Stylo 6 features better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. LG V30 counts with a little bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a back camera with more mega-pixels, a much better video quality and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs more than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Stylo 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy LG V30, else you can save some dollars and get the LG Stylo 6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.