Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the LG V30's overall score of 79.1. LG V30S ThinQ's design has the same thickness and weight than the LG V30. LG V30S ThinQ features a display that is just as good as LG V30's screen, they have a same size display, exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2880 and the same pixel density.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30 has a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have the same video resolution, a 0.32 inches back camera sensor, the same video frame rates, a same resolution camera in the back and the same diafragm aperture.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than LG V30, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. LG V30S ThinQ and LG V30 both count with really similar batteries duration.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V30. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V30, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.