Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the LG V30, getting an 86.2 score against 79.1. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is notably newer than the LG V30's, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. LG V30 features just a bit better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V30 has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G200 5G has a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto G200 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Moto G200 5G counts with a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.