Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2017-09-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a general score of 79.1 against 77.4. Even being the best in this review, the LG V30 is an a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The LG V30 and the Moto Z2 Force Edition both have quite similar CPUs, both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The LG V30 and the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition have quite similar displays, although the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little worse 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bit smaller display and a little bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch. The LG V30 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V30 also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the LG V30 one, they have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG V30 features longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V30 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.