Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2017-09-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30 is just a bit better than Moto Z2 Play, having a overall score of 79.1 against 77.4. The LG V30 is better than Moto Z2 Play, it must be told that it's also a little bit heavier and thicker. The LG V30 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V30 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger display. Moto Z2 Play's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as the LG V30 one, both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage.
The LG V30 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG V30 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG V30 also has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.