Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-09-21 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a general score of 79.1 against 77.6. Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also older, a little thicker and a bit heavier. LG V30 has a little bit better looking display than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V30 also has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a greater pixel amount per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z3 features as much memory to store more games and applications as LG V30, they have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same internal storage. The Moto Z3 and LG V30 count with similar CPUs, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. LG V30 features a little bit better camera than Moto Z3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 16 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments.
The LG V30 features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
LG V30 costs a bit more money than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.