Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 overall score. Motorola One Hyper is a newer cellphone than LG V30, but it is thicker and much heavier. The LG V30 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V30 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Hyper. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper has a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola One Hyper features superior battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a little more than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V30. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG V30, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.