Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 537 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than LG V30's score of 79.1. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a lot heavier than the LG V30, it's incredibly thinner and also extremely newer. LG V30 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V30 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior battery life than LG V30, because it has a 42 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.