Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a score of 80.5, which is a little bit better than the LG V30's 79.1 score. The Nokia 8.3 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the LG V30, although it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit superior processor than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has more RAM.
LG V30 features just a bit better looking display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater pixels amount per screen inch. The Nokia 8.3 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V30 features a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with greater battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V30. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Nokia 8.3 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V30, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.