Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than LG V30, with a overall score of 83.1 against 79.1. Although the OPPO Find X2 Pro is extremely newer than the LG V30, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than LG V30, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor and better video frame rates.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with longer battery life than LG V30, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.