Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a score of 79.1, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's overall score of 76. Despite of the fact that LG V30 is much older than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit more powerful processor than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V30, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit larger screen. LG V30 has more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V30 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.