Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 79.1 against 77. LG V30 is a a little thinner and lighter cellphone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit sharper screen than LG V30, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V30 has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30 has a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.