Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is just a bit better than LG V30, with an 82.1 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a newer phone than LG V30, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V30 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much better pixel density.
The LG V30 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy A13 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. The LG V30 has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V30 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A13 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.