Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | -- |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, having a global score of 79.1 against 76.2. LG V30's body is a lot lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy A16 5G. LG V30 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a bit more memory for games and applications than LG V30, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The LG V30 has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A16 5G. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A16 5G features a way better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size. The LG V30 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower 16 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V30, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.