Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Galaxy A21s, getting a general score of 79.1 against 77.7. The LG V30 body is thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A21s, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The LG V30 counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better count of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V30 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG V30 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A21s has a way better battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A21s has just a bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.