Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the LG V30, having a 79.9 score against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's body is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30. LG V30 has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than LG V30, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than LG V30, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a much more MP back camera. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much longer battery life than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.