Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than LG V30's general score of 79.1. The Galaxy A31 construction is newer than the LG V30's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V30 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The LG V30 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The LG V30 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V30 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a little bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A31 counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.