Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than LG V30's general score of 79.1. Galaxy A35 5G is a much newer cellphone than LG V30, but it's way heavier and a little thicker. LG V30 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30 features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A35 5G takes better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor.
The LG V30 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery life than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.