Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the LG V30, having a overall score of 90.7 against 79.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is extremely newer than the LG V30, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V30 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V30 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A52 has longer battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.