Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than LG V30, with a 91.3 score against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer than the LG V30's, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. LG V30 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than LG V30, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The LG V30 has a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.