Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than LG V30's global score of 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is much newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG V30. Samsung Galaxy A52s's processing unit is just as good as LG V30's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V30 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a much better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG V30, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.