Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A6, having a 79.1 score against 75.8. LG V30 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A6, although they were released with only a few months difference. LG V30 has a better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a lot better screen density and a little bigger display.
The LG V30 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30 also has more RAM. LG V30 counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V30 features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG V30 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the LG V30 also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a way better video resolution.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.