Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-09-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. LG V30 is an older device than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. LG V30 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
LG V30 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater display pixel density. The LG V30 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V30 also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The LG V30 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A70 counts with superior battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
LG V30 costs a little more money than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.