Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than LG V30's overall score of 79.1. Even though the Galaxy F23 is thicker than LG V30, it's much lighter and way newer. LG V30 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The LG V30 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory. LG V30 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V30 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.