Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2017-09-21 | 2017-06-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 307.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is a bit better than Galaxy J7 Max, with a 79.1 score against 76.1. The LG V30 is a just a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Galaxy J7 Max, even when both were released only 3 months apart. LG V30 has a little better performance than Galaxy J7 Max. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V30 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bit larger display and a greater pixel density. LG V30 features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a larger aperture, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot higher video resolution. Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's battery duration is very similar to the LG V30 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.