Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| 2017-09-21 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 307.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the LG V30, having a score of 90.8 against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a much newer device than the LG V30, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V30 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher display pixel density.
LG V30 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster processor than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with superior battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V30. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V30, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.